Список источников: Зубова Е.А. Оценка стоимости статистической жизни в России на основе микроданных // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2022. № 1 (53). С. 163–179. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-8.
Косякина А., Пономарева Е. Стоимость статистической жизни: оценки на основе концепции человеческого капитала // Экономическая политика. 2021. Т. 16, № 6. С. 94–119. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-6-94-119.
Поплавко П.С., Нагапетян А.Р. Вариация оценок готовности платить в зависимости от величины снижения риска смерти от загрязнения воздуха // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2024. № 5. С. 127‒135. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2024.5.16.
Поплавко П.С., Нагапетян А.Р. Разработка экономико-математического инструментария для оценки стоимости жизни с учетом убывающей предельной готовности платить за снижение дополнительной единицы риска смерти // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2025. № 6 (206). С. 166–175. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2025.6.19.
Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents / A. Krupnick [et al.] // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2002. Vol. 24, no. 2. P. 161‒186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014020027011.
Age, health, and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation survey of Shizuoka, Japan, residents / K. Itaoka [et al.] // Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. 2007. Vol. 8, no. 3. P. 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353958.
Andersson H., Svensson M. Cognitive ability and scale bias in the contingent valuation method: An analysis of willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk // Environmental and Resource Economics. 2008. Vol. 39, no 4. P. 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9137-0.
Arigoni Ortiz R., Markandya A., Hunt A. Willingness to pay for mortality risk reduction associated with air pollution in São Paulo // Revista Brasileira de Economia. 2009. Vol. 63, no. 1. P. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402009000100001.
Contingent valuation of nonmarket benefits in project economic analysis: a guide to good practice / A.J. Sajise [et al.]. Asian Development Bank, 2021. 208 p.
de Lima M. The value of a statistical life in Mexico // Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2020. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 140–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2019.1617196.
Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the US and Canada / A. Alberini [et al.] // Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2004. Vol. 48, no. 1. P. 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.10.005.
Eom Y.S., Ahn S., Shadbegian R. Willingness to pay to reduce mortality risks from particulate matter and value of statistical life: Evidence from stated air purifier rental choices in South Korea // Journal of Environmental Management. 2025. Vol. 373. Article 123407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123407.
Ghanem S., Ferrini S., Di Maria C. Air pollution and willingness to pay for health risk reductions in Egypt: A contingent valuation survey of Greater Cairo and Alexandria households // World Development. Vol. 172. Article 106373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106373.
Hammitt J.K. Valuing mortality risk: Theory and practice // Environmental Science & Technology. 2000. Vol. 34, no. 8. P. 1396–1400. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES990733N.
Hammitt J.K., Graham J.D. Willingness to pay for health protection: Inadequate sensitivity to probability? // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1999. Vol. 18. P. 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007760327375.
Handbook on the external costs of transport. Version 2019 – 1.1 / H. van Essen [et al.]. Luxembourg, 2019. 332 p. https://doi.org/10.2832/51388.
Hanemann M., Loomis J., Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double‐bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation // American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1991. Vol. 73, no. 4. P. 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453.
Herrera-Araujo D., Rheinberger C.M., Hammitt J.K. Valuing non-marginal changes in mortality and morbidity risk // Journal of Health Economics. 2022. Vol. 84 Article 102627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102627.
Leiter A.M., Pruckner G.J. Proportionality of willingness to pay to small changes in risk: the impact of attitudinal factors in scope tests // Environmental and Resource Economics. 2009. Vol. 42. P. 169‒186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9214-z.
Lopez-Feldman A. Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata // MPRA Paper. 2012. No. 41018. P. 1‒16. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41018/ (дата обращения: 17.10.2025).
Ports and their influence on local air pollution and public health: A global analysis / C. Ducruet [et al.] // Science of the Total Environment. 2024. Vol. 915. Article 170099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170099.
Wang H., Mullahy J. Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: a contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China // Science of the Total Environment. 2006. Vol. 367, no. 1. P. 50‒57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.049.
Who feels a greater environmental risk? Women, younger adults and pro-environmentally friendly people express higher concerns about a set of environmental exposures / M. Subiza-Pérez [et al.] // Environmental Research. 2020. Vol. 181. Article 108918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108918.
References: Alberini, A., Cropper, M., Krupnick, A. & Simon, N.B. (2004) Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the US and Canada
. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 48 (1), 769–792. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2003.10.005.
Andersson, H. & Svensson, M. (2008) Cognitive ability and scale bias in the contingent valuation method: An analysis of willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk.
Environmental and Resource Economics. 39 (4), 481–495. Available from: doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9137-0.
Arigoni Ortiz, R., Markandya, A. & Hunt, A. (2009) Willingness to pay for mortality risk reduction associated with air pollution in São Paulo.
Revista Brasileira de Economia. 63 (1), 3‒22. Available from: doi:10.1590/S0034-71402009000100001.
de Lima, M. (2020) The value of a statistical life in Mexico.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. 9 (2), 140–166. Available from: doi:10.1080/21606544.2019.1617196.
Ducruet, C., Polo Martin, B., Sene, M.A., Lo Prete, M., Sun, L., Itoh, H. & Pigné, Y. (2024) Ports and their influence on local air pollution and public health: A global analysis.
Science of the Total Environment. 915, 170099. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170099.
Eom, Y.S., Ahn, S. & Shadbegian, R. (2025) Willingness to pay to reduce mortality risks from particulate matter and value of statistical life: Evidence from stated air purifier rental choices in South Korea.
Journal of Environmental Management. 373, 123407. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123407.
Ghanem, S., Ferrini, S. & Di Maria, C. (2023) Air pollution and willingness to pay for health risk reductions in Egypt: A contingent valuation survey of Greater Cairo and Alexandria households.
World Development. 172, 106373. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106373.
Hammitt, J.K. & Graham, J.D. (1999) Willingness to pay for health protection: Inadequate sensitivity to probability?
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 18, 33–62. Available from: doi:10.1023/A:1007760327375.
Hammitt, J.K. (2000) Valuing mortality risk: Theory and practice.
Environmental Science & Technology. 34 (8), 1396–1400. Available from: doi:10.1021/ES990733N.
Hanemann, M., Loomis, J. & Kanninen, B. (1991) Statistical efficiency of double‐bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 73 (4), 1255‒1263. Available from: doi:10.2307/1242453.
Herrera-Araujo, D., Rheinberger, C.M. & Hammitt, J.K. (2022) Valuing non-marginal changes in mortality and morbidity risk.
Journal of Health Economics. 84, 102627. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102627.
Itaoka, K., Krupnick, A., Akai, M., Alberini, A., Cropper, M. & Simon, N. (2007) Age, health, and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation survey of Shizuoka, Japan, residents.
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. 8 (3), 211–237. Available from: doi:10.1007/BF03353958.
Kosyakina, A.I. & Ponomareva, E.A. (2021) The Value of a Statistical Life: Estimates Based on the Concept of Human Capital.
Economic Policy. 16 (6), 94‒119. Available from: doi:10.18288/1994-5124-2021-6-94-119. (In Russian)
Krupnick, A., Alberini, A., Cropper, M. & Heintzelman, M.D. (2002) Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 24 (2), 161–186. Available from: doi:10.1023/A:1014020027011.
Leiter, A.M. & Pruckner, G.J. (2009) Proportionality of willingness to pay to small changes in risk: The impact of attitudinal factors in scope tests.
Environmental and Resource Economics. 42, 169–186. Available from: doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9214-z.
Lopez-Feldman, A. (2012) Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata.
MPRA Paper. (41018), 1‒16. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41018/ (accessed: 17.10.2025).
Poplavko, P.S. & Nagapetyan, A.R. (2024) Variation in Willingness-to-Pay Estimates Depending on the Magnitude of the Reduction in the Risk of Death from Air Pollution.
Theory and Practice of Social Development. (5), 127–135. Available from: doi:10.24158/tipor.2024.5.16. (In Russian)
Poplavko, P.S. & Nagapetyan, A.R. (2025) Development of Economic and Mathematical Tools for Estimating the Cost of Living Taking into Account the Decreasing Marginal Willingness to Pay for the Reduction of an Additional Unit of Death Risk.
Theory and Practice of Social Development. (6), 166–175. Available from: doi:10.24158/tipor.2025.6.19 (In Russian).
Sajise, A.J., Samson, J.N., Quiao, L., Sibal, J., Raitzer, D.A. & Harder, D. (2021)
Contingent valuation of nonmarket benefits in project economic analysis: a guide to good practice. Asian Development Bank. 208 p.
Subiza-Pérez, M., Santa Marina, L., Irizar, A., Gallastegi, M., Anabitarte, A. & Urbieta, N. et al. (2020) Who feels a greater environmental risk? Women, younger adults and pro-environmentally friendly people express higher concerns about a set of environmental exposures.
Environmental Research. 181, 108918. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108918.
van Essen, H., van Wijngaarden, L., Schroten, A., Sutter, D., Bieler, C. & Maffii, S. (2019)
Handbook on the external costs of transport. Version 2019 – 1.1. Luxembourg. 332 p. Available from: doi:10.2832/51388.
Wang, H. & Mullahy, J. (2006) Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: A contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China.
Science of the Total Environment. 367 (1), 50–57. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.049.
Zubova, E.A. (2022) Value of statistical life in Russia based on microdata.
Journal of the New Economic Association. (1 (53)), 163–179. Available from: doi:10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-8. (In Russian)