Научная статья
УДК 323.22/.28
https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2026.4.11

Политическая самоэффективность как фактор политического участия:

кросс-национальный анализ

 
Данил Дмитриевич Альшанский
Российский экономический университет имени Г.В. Плеханова, Москва, Россия,
danilidze24@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6488-0994
 
Аннотация. В статье анализируется влияние политической самоэффективности на различные формы политического участия (офлайн, онлайн и электоральное) в России и европейских странах. Теоретической основой выступает теория запланированного поведения. Эмпирическую базу составляют данные Европейского социального исследования (ESS) и авторского опроса, проведенного в 2025 г. По результатам анализа построенных логистических моделей, учитывающих ряд социально-демографических и поведенческих контрольных переменных, устанавливается, что в Европе внутренняя и внешняя политическая самоэффективность устойчиво связаны со всеми формами участия (кроме внешней политической самоэффективности для офлайн-участия в 11-й волне ESS). В России влияние носит ограниченный характер: в 2025 г. значимой оказывается преимущественно внутренняя самоэффективность для электорального участия, тогда как внешняя не влияет. Полученные выводы подчеркивают роль институционального контекста и подтверждают, что влияние политической самоэффективности является контекстуально обусловленным.
Ключевые слова: политическое участие, политическая самоэффективность, внутренняя самоэффективность, внешняя самоэффективность, теория запланированного поведения, онлайн-участие, офлайн-участие, электоральное поведение, Европейское социальное исследование
Финансирование: инициативная работа.
Для цитирования: Альшанский Д.Д. Политическая самоэффективность как фактор политического участия: кросс-национальный анализ // Общество: политика, экономика, право. 2026. № 4. С. 107–113. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2026.4.11.
 
Original article
 

Political Self-Efficacy as a Factor in Political Participation:

A Cross-National Analysis

 
Danil D. Alshanskiy
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia,
danilidze24@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6488-0994
 
Abstract. The article analyzes the impact of political self-efficacy on various forms of political participation (offline, online, and electoral) in Russia and European countries. The theoretical basis is the theory of planned behavior. The empirical base consists of data from the European Social Survey (ESS) and the author’s survey conducted in 2025. Based on the analysis of the constructed logistic models, which take into account a number of socio-demographic and behavioral control variables, it is established that in Europe, internal and external political self-efficacy are consistently associated with all forms of participation (except external political self-efficacy for offline participation in the 11^th ESS wave). In Russia, the impact is limited: in 2025, internal self-efficacy for electoral participation is mainly significant, while external self-efficacy has no effect. The findings emphasize the role of the institutional context and confirm that the impact of political self-efficacy is contextually determined.
Keywords: political participation, political self-efficacy, internal self-efficacy, external self-efficacy, theory of planned behavior, online participation, offline participation, voting behavior, European Social Survey
Funding: Independent work.
For citation: Alshanskiy, D.D. (2026) Political Self-Efficacy as a Factor in Political Participation: A Cross-National Analysis. Society: Politics, Economics, Law. (4), 107–113. Available from: doi:10.24158/pep.2026.4.11 (In Russian).

© Альшанский Д.Д., 2026

Список источников:
 
Альшанский Д.Д. Влияние медиапотребления на политическую самоэффективность // Via in Tempore. История. Политология. 2024. Т. 51, № 4. С. 1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2024-51-4-1056-1065.
Альшанский Д.Д. Взаимосвязь образования и политической самоэффективности: особенности влияния на политическое участие // Общество: политика, экономика, право. 2025а. № 6. С. 51–56. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2025.6.6.
Альшанский Д.Д. Влияние религиозности на политическую самоэффективность // Теории и проблемы политических исследований. 2025б. Т. 14, № 1А. С. 18–27.
Сариева И.Р. Политическая самоэффективность: теоретические подходы и актуальные исследования // Психологические исследования. 2019. Т. 12, № 64. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v12i64.231.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. Vol. 50, no. 2. P. 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Chou E.Y., Hsu D.Y., Hernon E. From Slacktivism to Activism: Improving the Commitment Power of E-Pledges for Prosocial Causes // PloS one. 2020. Vol. 15, no. 4. Article 0231314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231314.
De Jong M.D.T., Neulen S., Jansma S.R. Citizens’ intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives: Comparing three co-creation configurations // Government Information Quarterly. 2019. Vol. 36, no. 3. P. 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.04.003.
European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS round 8 ‒ 2016. Welfare attitudes, Attitudes to climate change. Sikt ‒ Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS8-2016.
European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS round 11 ‒ 2023. Social inequalities in health, Gender in contemporary Europe. Sikt ‒ Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2025. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess11-2023.
How Political Efficacy Relates to Online and Offline Political Participation: A Multilevel Meta-analysis / A. Grinson [et al.] // Political Communication. 2022. Vol. 39, no. 5. P. 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329.
Kim S., Lee J. Gender and e-participation in local governance: Citizen e-participation values and social ties // International Journal of Public Administration. 2019. Vol. 42, no. 13. P. 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1575669.
Matthews F. The value of “between-election” political participation: Do parliamentary e-petitions matter to political elites? // The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2021. Vol. 23, no. 3. P. 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120959041.
Mitsch F., Lee N., Morrow El.R. Faith no more? The divergence of political trust between urban and rural Europe // Political Geography. 2021. Vol. 89. Article 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102426.
Prats M., Meunier A. Political efficacy and participation: An empirical analysis in European countries // OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. 2021. No. 46. P. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1787/4548cad8-en.
Scotto T.J., Xena C. Efficacy, political // International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, 2015. P. 301–307.
Zhu Q., Skoric M., Shen F.I shield myself from thee: Selective avoidance on social media during political protests // Political Communication. 2017. Vol. 34, no. 1. P. 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1222471.

References:
 
Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50 (2), 179–211. Available from: doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Alshanskiy, D.D. (2024) The influence of media consumption on political self-efficacy. Via in Tempore. History and Political Science. 51 (4), 1056–1065. Available from: doi:10.52575/2687-0967-2024-51-4-1056-1065. (In Russian)
Alshanskiy, D.D. (2025) The influence of religiosity on political self-efficacy. Theories and Problems of Political Studies. 14 (1A), 18–27. (In Russian)
Alshanskiy, D.D. (2025) The relationship between education and political self-efficacy: features of influence on political participation. Society: Politics, Economics, Law. (6), 51–56. Available from: doi:10.24158/pep.2025.6.6. (In Russian)
Chou, E.Y., Hsu, D.Y. & Hernon, E. (2020) From Slacktivism to Activism: Improving the Commitment Power of E-Pledges for Prosocial Causes. PloS one. 15 (4), 0231314. Available from: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231314.
De Jong, M.D.T., Neulen, S. & Jansma, S.R. (2019) Citizens’ intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives: Comparing three co-creation configurations. Government Information Quarterly. 36 (3), 490–500. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.04.003.
European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC) (2023) ESS round 8 ‒ 2016. Welfare attitudes, Attitudes to climate change. Sikt ‒ Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. Available from: doi:10.21338/NSD-ESS8-2016.
European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC) (2025) ESS round 11 ‒ 2023. Social inequalities in health, Gender in contemporary Europe. Sikt ‒ Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. Available from: doi:10.21338/ess11-2023.
Grinson, A., Oser, J., Boulianne, S. & Halperin, E. (2022) How Political Efficacy Relates to Online and Offline Political Participation: A Multilevel Meta-analysis. Political Communication. 39 (5), 607–633. Available from: doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329.
Kim, S. & Lee, J. (2019) Gender and e-participation in local governance: Citizen e-participation values and social ties. International Journal of Public Administration. 42 (13), 1073–1083. Available from: doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1575669.
Matthews, F. (2021) The value of “between-election” political participation: Do parliamentary e-petitions matter to political elites? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 23 (3), 410–429. Available from: doi:10.1177/1369148120959041.
Mitsch, F., Lee, N. & Morrow, El.R. (2021) Faith no more? The divergence of political trust between urban and rural Europe. Political Geography. 89, 102426. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102426.
Prats, M. & Meunier, A. (2021) Political efficacy and participation: An empirical analysis in European countries. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. (46), 1–23. Available from: doi:10.1787/4548cad8-en.
Sarieva, I.R. (2019) Political self-efficacy: theoretical approaches and contemporary research. Psychological Studies. 12 (64). Available from: doi:10.54359/ps.v12i64.231. (In Russian)
Scotto, T.J. & Xena, C. (2015) Efficacy, political. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, pp. 301–307.
Zhu, Q., Skoric, M. & Shen, F. (2017) I shield myself from thee: Selective avoidance on social media during political protests. Political Communication. 34 (1), 112–131. Available from: doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1222471.