Ружников И.В. Пространственный статизм и управление миграцией в мегаполисах: теоретико-концептуальный анализ

Научная статья
УДК 314.74
https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2025.12.7

Пространственный статизм и управление миграцией в мегаполисах:
теоретико-концептуальный анализ
 
Илья Владимирович Ружников
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы
при Президенте Российской Федерации, Москва, Россия,
rujnikov.ilya@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5613-6141
 
Аннотация. В статье анализируется потенциал концепции пространственного статизма для изучения мегаполисов и международной миграции на базе структурированного обзора литературы и сопоставления по четырем критериям: характер управления в мегаполисе, положение мегаполисов в правовой системе, институциональные особенности мегаполисного управления, роль международной миграции. На их основе реконструируется подход Р. Хиршля и А. Шахар и определяются его аналитические возможности в контексте современных урбанистических и миграционных исследований. Показано, что пространственный статизм позволяет выявить несоответствия между функциональными масштабами агломераций и их формально закрепленными полномочиями. Международная миграция рассматривается как один из факторов, усиливающих эти расхождения и обостряющих напряжение между глобальными потоками и государственно-центричными механизмами регулирования. В заключение обсуждаются ограничения концепции и перспективы ее применения в анализе политических институтов мегаполисов.
Ключевые слова: мегаполис, пространственный статизм, международная миграция, управление, конституционный статус городов
Финансирование: инициативная работа.
Для цитирования: Ружников И.В. Пространственный статизм и управление миграцией в мегаполисах: теоретико-концептуальный анализ // Общество: политика, экономика, право. 2025. № 12. С. 50–57. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2025.12.7.
 
Original article
 
Spatial Statism and Migration Governance in Megacities:
Theoretical-Conceptual Analysis
 
Ilya V. Ruzhnikov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy
and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia,
rujnikov.ilya@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5613-6141
 
Abstract. The study examines the potential of the spatial statism concept for analyzing megacities and international migration based on a structured literature review and comparison across four criteria: the nature of governance in megacities, the position of megacities in the legal system, institutional features of megacity governance, and the role of international migration. On this basis, the approach of R. Hirschl and A. Shahar is reconstructed and its analytical capabilities in the context of modern urban and migration studies are determined. It is demonstrated that spatial statism allows for the identification of discrepancies between the functional scales of agglomerations and their formally established powers. International migration is considered as one of the factors that exacerbate these discrepancies and intensify the tension between global flows and state-centric regulatory mechanisms. In conclusion, the limitations of the concept and prospects for its application in the analysis of megacity political institutions are discussed.
Keywords: megacity, spatial statism, international migration, governance, constitutional status of cities
Funding: Independent work.
For citation: Ruzhnikov, I.V. (2025) Spatial Statism and Migration Governance in Megacities: Theoretical-Conceptual Analysis. Society: Politics, Economics, Law. (12), 50–57. Available from: doi:10.24158/pep.2025.12.7 (In Russian).

© Ружников И.В., 2025

Список источников:
 
Бруз В.В. Тенденции урбанизации и проблемы управления современным мегаполисом // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Сер.: Экономика. 2020. № 4. C. 26–38. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6646-2020-4-26-38.
Калистратова М.А. Мегаполис как особый тип современного города // Вестник Гуманитарного университета. 2022. № 3. С. 129–135. https://doi.org/10.35853/vestnik.gu.2022.3(38).12.
Литвинов С.В., Титова М.М. Анализ методологических подходов к изучению мегаполиса // Вестник Томского государственного архитектурно-строительного университета. 2020. Т. 22, № 4. C. 37–47. https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2020-22-4-37-47.
Мамедов А.К., Гогохия Н.З., Гурбанова А.А. Социокультурная оптика исследования мегаполиса // Вестник РГГУ. Сер.: Экономика и управление. 2025. № 3. C. 75–92. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2025-3-75-92.
Нотман О.В. Концептуализация понятия «мегаполис»: формально-количественный, правовой, функциональный и системный подходы // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Сер.: Социология. Политология. 2021. Т. 21, № 2. С. 143–149. https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2021-21-2-143-149.
Clark G., Moonen T. World cities and nation states. Chichester, 2017. 304 p.
Doyle O. Spatial statism: Afterword to the Foreword by Ran Hirschl and Ayelet Shachar // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2020. Vol. 18, no. 1. P. 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa009.
Finck M. Constitutional imaginations of the state: Afterword to the foreword by Ran Hirschl and Ayelet Shachar // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2020. Vol. 18, no. 1. P. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa010.
Gardner J.A. Can liberal constitutionalism survive the rise of the megacity? // Law & Social Inquiry. 2022. Vol. 47, no. 3. P. 1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.18.
Gross J.S., Savitch H.V. New York. Newcastle upon Tyne, 2023. 208 p.
Hirsch A.L. The borders beyond the border: Australia’s extraterritorial migration controls // Refugee Survey Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 36, no. 3. P. 48–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdx008.
Hirschl R. City, state: Constitutionalism and the megacity. L., 2020а. 266 p.
Hirschl R. Comparative constitutional inquiry: The North American angle // Constitutional Studies. 2025. Vol. 11, no. 1. P. 185–206. https://doi.org/10.15781/trf0r947.
Hirschl R. Comparative matters: The renaissance of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, 2014. 320 p.
Hirschl R. Constitutions and the metropolis // Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2020б. Vol. 16. P. 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-051920-020619.
Hirschl R. The “Era of the City” as an emerging challenge to liberal constitutional democracy // Ethics & International Affairs. 2022. Vol. 36, no. 4. P. 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679422000478.
Hirschl R. The city as an anti-canonical concept in constitutional law (And recent attempts to change that) // Global canons in an age of contestation: Debating foundational texts of constitutional democracy and human rights / ed. by S. Choudhry, M. Hailbronner, M. Kumm. Oxford, 2024. P. 495–514.
Hirschl R., Shachar A. Spatial statism // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2019. Vol. 17, no. 2. P. 387–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz052.
Kübler D., Lefèvre C. Megacity governance and the state // Urban Research & Practice. 2018. Vol. 11, no. 4. P. 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1347810.
Kuo M.-S. Making constitutionalism progressive again: A primer on city constitutionalism and state (re)formation in a new constitutional geography // Modern Law Review. 2022. Vol. 85, no. 3. P. 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12692.
Lefevre C. Paris (Megacities). Newcastle upon Tyne, 2021. 200 p.
Norman K.P. Urbanization, informal governance and refugee integration in Egypt // Globalizations. 2024. Vol. 21, no. 2. P. 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1907510.
Parnreiter C. Mexico: The making of a global city // Global networks: Linked cities / ed. by S. Sassen. L., 2002. P. 145–182.
Prell U. The city: An interdisciplinary introduction to urban studies. Opladen, 2022. 144 p.
Shachar A. Solidarity in place? Hope and despair in postpandemic membership // Ethics & International Affairs. 2022. Vol. 36, no. 4. P. 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679422000491.
Shachar A. The birthright lottery: Citizenship and global inequality. Cambridge, 2009. 290 p.
Sivaramakrishnan K.C. Governance of megacities: Fractured thinking, fragmented setup. New Delhi, 2014. 372 p.
Wojciechowska M. Understanding megacities. An argument on the role of democratic ideals // Political Geography. 2022. Vol. 97. P. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102693.
 
References:
 
Bruz, V.V. (2020) Trends of urbanization and problems of governing the modern megapolis. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Economics. (4), 26–38. Available from: doi:10.18384/2310-6646-2020-4-26-38. (In Russian)
Clark, G. & Moonen, T. (2017) World cities and nation states. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell.
Doyle, O. (2020) Spatial statism: Afterword to the Foreword by Ran Hirschl and Ayelet Shachar. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 18 (1), 29–35. Available from: doi:10.1093/icon/moaa009.
Finck, M. (2020) Constitutional imaginations of the state: Afterword to the foreword by Ran Hirschl and Ayelet Shachar. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 18 (1), 15–21. Available from: doi:10.1093/icon/moaa010.
Gardner, J.A. (2022) Can liberal constitutionalism survive the rise of the megacity? Law & Social Inquiry. 47 (3), 1055–1060. Available from: doi:10.1017/lsi.2022.18.
Gross, J.S. & Savitch, H.V. (2023) New York. Newcastle upon Tyne, Agenda Publishing.
Hirsch, A.L. (2017) The borders beyond the border: Australia’s extraterritorial migration controls. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 36 (3), 48–80. Available from: doi:10.1093/rsq/hdx008.
Hirschl, R. (2014) Comparative matters: The renaissance of comparative constitutional law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hirschl, R. (2020а) City, state: Constitutionalism and the megacity. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hirschl, R. (2020б) Constitutions and the metropolis. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 16, 59–77. Available from: doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-051920-020619.
Hirschl, R. (2022) The “Era of the City” as an emerging challenge to liberal constitutional democracy. Ethics & International Affairs. 36 (4), 455–473. Available from: doi:10.1017/S0892679422000478.
Hirschl, R. (2024) The city as an anti-canonical concept in constitutional law (And recent attempts to change that). In: Choudhry, S., Hailbronner, M. & Kumm, M. (eds.) Global canons in an age of contestation: Debating foundational texts of constitutional democracy and human rights. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 495–514.
Hirschl, R. (2025) Comparative constitutional inquiry: The North American angle. Constitutional Studies. 11 (1), 185–206. Available from: doi:10.15781/trf0r947.
Hirschl, R. & Shachar, A. (2019) Spatial statism. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 17 (2), 387–438. Available from: doi:10.1093/icon/moz052.
Kalistratova, M.A. (2022) Metropolis as a special type of modern city. Bulletin of Liberal Arts University. (3), 129–135. Available from: doi:10.35853/vestnik.gu.2022.3(38).12. (In Russian)
Kübler, D. & Lefèvre, C. (2018) Megacity governance and the state. Urban Research & Practice. 11 (4), 378–395. Available from: doi:10.1080/17535069.2017.1347810.
Kuo, M.-S. (2022) Making constitutionalism progressive again: A primer on city constitutionalism and state (re)formation in a new constitutional geography. Modern Law Review. 85 (3), 801–820. Available from: doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12692.
Lefevre, C. (2021) Paris (Megacities). Newcastle upon Tyne, Agenda Publishing.
Litvinov, S.V. & Titova, M.M. (2020) Analysis of methodological approaches to metropolis study. Journal of Construction and Architecture. 22 (4), 37–47. Available from: doi:10.31675/1607-1859-2020-22-4-37-47. (In Russian)
Mamedov, A.K., Gogokhia, N.Z. & Gurbanova, A.A. (2025) Sociocultural optics of metropolis research. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Economics. Management. Law Series. (3), 75–92. Available from: doi:10.28995/2073-6304-2025-3-75-92. (In Russian)
Norman, K.P. (2024) Urbanization, informal governance and refugee integration in Egypt. Globalizations. 21 (2), 287–302. Available from: doi:1080/14747731.2021.1907510.
Notman, O.V. (2021) The conceptualization of “megacity”: Formal-quantitative, legal, functional and systemic approaches. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology. 21 (2), 143–149. Available from: doi:10.18500/1818-9601-2021-21-2-143-149. (In Russian)
Parnreiter, C. (2002) Mexico: The making of a global city. In: Sassen, S. (ed.) Global networks: Linked cities. London, Routledge, 145–182.
Prell, U. (2022) The city: An interdisciplinary introduction to urban studies. Opladen, Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Shachar, A. (2009) The birthright lottery: Citizenship and global inequality. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Shachar, A. (2022) Solidarity in place? Hope and despair in postpandemic membership. Ethics & International Affairs. 36 (4), 487–504. Available from: doi:10.1017/S0892679422000491.
Sivaramakrishnan, K.C. (2014) Governance of megacities: Fractured thinking, fragmented setup. New Delhi, Oxford University Press.
Wojciechowska, M. (2022) Understanding megacities. An argument on the role of democratic ideals. Political Geography. 97, 1–9. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102693.