Пупкова Ю.В., Евсеева А.А. Социологический анализ качества внутренней среды учебных помещений (на примере университетов города Краснодара)

PDF

XML

УДК 316.354:378.1
https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2025.9.9

Социологический анализ качества внутренней среды учебных помещений

(на примере университетов города Краснодара)

Юлия Валентиновна Пупкова¹, Анастасия Александровна Евсеева²
^1,2Кубанский государственный технологический университет, Краснодар, Россия
¹pupjul@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-4393
²nastyaev781505@gmail.com

Аннотация. В статье представлены результаты анкетного опроса студентов, направленного на выявление ключевых проблем микроклимата и освещенности в учебных аудиториях г. Краснодара. Установлено, что значительная часть респондентов испытывает дискомфорт, обусловленный неудовлетворительным состоянием внутренней среды университета. Снижение работоспособности во время учебных занятий большинство опрошенных связывает с такими факторами, как повышенная температура воздуха и высокая концентрация пыли в студенческих аудиториях. Несмотря на распространенную среди обучающихся уверенность в достаточности материальных ресурсов университета для повышения комфортности микроклимата учебных помещений, в ответах респондентов доминирует скептицизм в отношении реальных улучшений условий обучения в ближайшем будущем. Обосновывается, что состояние аудиторного фонда является важным фактором учебной мотивации и требует разработки комплексных программ модернизации учебного пространства с учетом потребностей и предложений обучающихся в вузе.
Ключевые слова: университет, внутренняя среда учебного помещения, аудиторный фонд, микроклимат аудитории, комфортные микроклиматические условия, субъективные ощущения микроклимата, студенты
Финансирование: инициативная работа.
Для цитирования: Пупкова Ю.В., Евсеева А.А. Социологический анализ качества внутренней среды учебных помещений (на примере университетов города Краснодара) // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2025. № 9. С. 93–100. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2025.9.9.

Sociological Analysis of the Quality of the Internal Environment of Educational Spaces

(Case Study of Universities in the City of Krasnodar)

Yulia V. Pupkova¹, Anastasia A. Evseeva²
^1,2Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar, Russia
¹pupjul@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-4393
²nastyaev781505@gmail.com

Abstract. The article presents the results of a questionnaire survey of students aimed at identifying key problems of the microclimate and lighting in classrooms in Krasnodar. It was found that a significant portion of respondents experience discomfort due to the unsatisfactory state of the internal environment of the university. The majority of respondents associate a decrease in performance during classes with such factors as elevated air temperature and high dust concentration in student classrooms. Despite the prevailing confidence among students in the sufficiency of the university’s material resources to improve the comfort of the microclimate of classrooms, skepticism prevails among respondents regarding real improvements in learning conditions in the near future. It is substantiated that the state of the classroom fund is an important factor in educational motivation and requires the development of comprehensive programs for the modernization of the educational space, taking into account the needs and suggestions of students at the university.
Keywords: university, internal environment of classrooms, classroom fund, classroom microclimate, comfortable microclimate conditions, subjective sensations of microclimate, students
Funding: Independent work.
For citation: Pupkova, Yu.V. & Evseeva, A.A. (2025) Sociological Analysis of the Quality of the Internal Environment of Educational Spaces (Case Study of Universities in the City of Krasnodar). Theory and Practice of Social Development. (9), 93–100. Available from: doi:10.24158/tipor.2025.9.9 (In Russian).

© Пупкова Ю.В., Евсеева А.А., 2025

Список источников:

Влияние периодического проветривания в учебном кабинете на качество воздуха и микроклимат / Д.С. Симонов [и др.] // Архитектура, строительство, транспорт. 2025. Т. 5, № 1 (111). С. 39–51. https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232X-2025-1-39-51.
Гигиеническая оценка состава воздушной среды студенческих аудиторий / Е.Ю. Горбаткова [и др.] // Гигиена и санитария. 2022. Т. 101, № 4. С. 453–458. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-4-453-458.
Гигиенические и психофизиологические особенности формирования здоровья студентов медицинского вуза / И.Б. Ушаков [и др.] // Гигиена и санитария. 2018. Т. 97, № 8. С. 756–761. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2018-97-8-756-761.
Давлетова Н.Х., Тафеева Е.А. Субъективная оценка студентами условий обучения в спортивном вузе // Вестник новых медицинских технологий. Электронное издание. 2020. № 6. С. 87–93. https://doi.org/10.24411/2075-4094-2020-16746.
Barbic F., Minonzio M., Cairo B., Shiffer D., Dipasquale A., Cerina L., Vatteroni A., Urechie V., Verzeletti P., Badilini F., M., Iatrino R., Porta A., Santambrogio M., Gatti R., Furlan R. Effects of Different Classroom Temperatures on Cardiac Autonomic Control and Cognitive Performances in Undergraduate Students // Physiological Measurement. 2019. Vol. 40, iss. 5. P. 054005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ab1816.
Beshir M.Y., Ramsey J.D. Comparison between Male and Female Subjective Estimates of Thermal Effects and Sensations // Applied Ergonomics. 1981. Vol. 12, iss. 1. P. 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(81)90091-0.
Chang T.Y., Kajackaite A. Battle for the Thermostat: Gender and the Effect of Temperature on Cognitive Performance // PLoS One. 2019. Vol. 14, iss. 5. P. e0216362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216362.
Disci Z.N., Lawrence R., Sharples S. Impact of the Climate Background of Students on Thermal Perception: Implications for Comfort and Energy Use in University Lecture Theatres // Buildings. 2024. Vol. 14, iss. 6. P. 1867. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061867.
Fedele A., Colantoni A., Calabrò G., Scungio M., Rossi S., Taborri J. Measuring CO2 Concentration and Thermal Comfort in Italian University Classrooms: A Seasonal Analysis // Sensors (Basel). 2025. Vol. 25, iss. 7. P. 1970. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25071970.
Karjalainen S. Thermal Comfort and Gender: a Literature Review // Indoor Air. 2012. Vol. 22, iss. 2. P. 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x.
Kim J., Dear R., Candido C., Zhang H., Arens E. Gender Differences in Office Occupant Perception of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) // Building and Environment. 2013. Vol. 70. P. 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.022.
Krawczyk D., Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk K., Rodero A. The Analysis of Microclimate Parameters in the Classrooms Located in Different Climate Zones // Applied Thermal Engineering. 2017. Vol. 113. P. 1088–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.089.
Lamberti G., Leccese F., Salvadori G. Analysis of the Interplay between Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort in University Classrooms for Enhanced HVAC Control // Energies. 2024. Vol. 17, iss. 20. P. 5053.https://doi.org/10.3390/EN17205053.
Lan L., Wargocki P., Wyon D.P., Lian Z. Effects of Thermal Discomfort in an Office on Perceived Air Quality, SBS Symptoms, Physiological Responses, and Human Performance // Indoor Air. 2011. Vol. 21, iss. 5. P. 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00714.x.
Laurent J.G.C., MacNaughton P., Jones E., Young A.S., Bliss M., Flanigan S., Vallarino J., Chen L.J., Cao X., Allen J.G. Associations between Acute Exposures to PM2.5 and Carbon Dioxide Indoors and Cognitive Function in Office Workers: A Multicountry Longitudinal Prospective Observational Study // Environmental Research Letters. 2021. Vol. 16, iss. 9. P. 094047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1bd8.
Norbäck D., Nordström K. Sick Building Syndrome in Relation to Air Exchange Rate, CO2, Room Temperature and Relative Air Humidity in University Computer Classrooms: an Experimental Study // International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2008. Vol. 82. P. 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0301-9.
Pradhan S., Jang Y., Chauhan H. Investigating Effects of Indoor Temperature and lighting on University Students’ Learning Performance Considering Sensation, Comfort, and Physiological Responses // Building and Environment. 2024. Vol. 253. P. 111346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111346.
Ramalho O., Wyart G., Mandin C., Blondeau P., Cabanes P.A., Leclerc N., Mullot J.U., Boulanger G., Redaelli M. Association of Carbon Dioxidewith Indoor Air Pollutants and Exceedance of Health Guideline Values // Building and Environment. 2015. Vol. 93-1. Р. 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.018.
Tsantaki E., Smyrnakis E., Constantinidis T.C., Benos A. Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome in a University Setting: a Case Study in Greece // International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 2020. Vol. 32, iss. 3. P. 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2020.1789567.

References:

Barbic, F., Minonzio, M., Cairo, B., Shiffer, D., Dipasquale, A., Cerina, L., Vatteroni, A., Urechie, V., Verzeletti, P., Badilini, F., Vaglio, M., Iatrino, R., Porta, A., Santambrogio, M., Gatti, R. & Furlan, R. (2019) Effects of Different Classroom Temperatures on Cardiac Autonomic Control and Cognitive Performances in Undergraduate Students. Physiological Measurement. 40 (5), 054005. Available from: doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ab1816.
Beshir, M. Y., Ramsey, J. D. (1981) Comparison between Male and Female Subjective Estimates of Thermal Effects and Sensations. Applied Ergonomics. 12 (1), 29–33. Available from: doi:10.1016/0003-6870(81)90091-0.
Chang, T. Y. & Kajackaite, A. (2019) Battle for the Thermostat: Gender and the Effect of Temperature on Cognitive Performance. PLoS One. 14 (5), e0216362. Available from: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216362.
Davletova, N. Ch. & Tafeeva, E. A. (2020) Subjective Students Assessment of Learning Conditions in a Sport University. Journal of New Medical Technologies, Eedition. (6), 87–93. Available from: doi:10.24411/2075-4094-2020-16746. (In Russian)
Disci, Z. N., Lawrence, R. & Sharples, S. (2024) Impact of the Climate Background of Students on Thermal Perception: Implications for Comfort and Energy Use in University Lecture Theatres. Buildings. 14 (6), 1867. Available from: doi:10.3390/buildings14061867.
Fedele, A., Colantoni, A., Calabrò, G., Scungio, M., Rossi, S. & Taborri, J. (2025) Measuring CO2 Concentration and Thermal Comfort in Italian University Classrooms: A Seasonal Analysis. Sensors (Basel). 25 (7), 1970. Available from: doi:10.3390/s25071970.
Gorbatkova, E. Yu., Akhmadullina, Kh. M., Ahmadullin, U. Z., Zulkarnaev, T. R., Husnutdinova, Z. H. & Manuilova, G. R. (2022) Hygienic Assessment of the Air Environment of Student Classrooms. Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian Journal. 101 (4), 453–458. Available from: doi:10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-4-453-458. (In Russian)
Karjalainen, S. (2012) Thermal Comfort and Gender: a Literature Review. Indoor Air. 22 (2), 96–109. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x.
Kim, J., Dear, R., Candido, C., Zhang, H. & Arens, E. (2013) Gender Differences in Office Occupant Perception of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ). Building and Environment. 70, 245–256. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.022.
Krawczyk, D., Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk, K. & Rodero, A. (2017) The Analysis of Microclimate Parameters in the Classrooms Located in Different Climate Zones. Applied Thermal Engineering. 113, 1088–1096. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.089.
Lamberti, G., Leccese, F. & Salvadori, G. (2024) Analysis of the Interplay between Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort in University Classrooms for Enhanced HVAC Control. Energies. 17 (20), 5053. Available from: doi:10.3390/EN17205053.
Lan, L., Wargocki, P., Wyon, D. P. & Lian, Z. (2011) Effects of Thermal Discomfort in an Office on Perceived Air Quality, SBS Symptoms, Physiological Responses, and Human Performance. Indoor Air. 21 (5), 376–390. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00714.x.
Laurent, J. G. C., MacNaughton, P., Jones, E., Young, A. S., Bliss, M., Flanigan, S., Vallarino, J., Chen, L. J., Cao, X. & Allen, J. G. (2021) Associations between Acute Exposures to PM2.5 and Carbon Dioxide Indoors and Cognitive Function in Office Workers: A Multicountry Longitudinal Prospective Observational Study. Environmental Research Letters. 16 (9), 094047. Available from: doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1bd8.
Norbäck, D. & Nordström, K. (2008) Sick Building Syndrome in Relation to Air Exchange Rate, CO2, Room Temperature and Relative Air Humidity in University Computer Classrooms: an Experimental Study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 82, 21–30. Available from: doi:10.1007/s00420-008-0301-9.
Pradhan, S., Jang, Y. & Chauhan, H. (2024) Investigating Effects of Indoor Temperature and lighting on University Students’ Learning Performance Considering Sensation, Comfort, and Physiological Responses. Building and Environment. 253, 111346. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111346.
Ramalho, O., Wyart, G., Mandin, C., Blondeau, P., Cabanes, P. A., Leclerc, N., Mullot, J. U., Boulanger, G., Redaelli, M. (2015) Association of Carbon Dioxidewith Indoor Air Pollutants and Exceedance of Health Guideline Values. Building and Environment. 93-1, 115–124. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.018.
Simonov, D. S., Morozov, A. Yu., Konovalova, K. D., Miskova, E. L. (2025) Effect of Periodic Ventilation in a Classroom on Air Quality and Microclimate. Architecture, Construction, Transport. 5 (1 (111), 39–51. Available from: doi:10.31660/2782-232X-2025-1-39-51. (In Russian)
Tsantaki, E., Smyrnakis, E., Constantinidis, T. C. & Benos, A. (2020) Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome in a University Setting: a Case Study in Greece. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 32 (3), 595–615. Available from: doi:10.1080/09603123.2020.1789567.
Ushakov, I. B., Melikhova, E. P., Libina, I. I. & Gubina, O. I. (2018) Hygienic and Psychophysiological Peculiarities of Forming Health of Students of the Medical University. Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian Journal. 97 (8), 756–761. Available from: doi:10.18821/0016-9900-2018-97-8-756-761. (In Russian)